Wednesday, 10 April 2013
The Handmade & The Homemade II

I also really liked Eryn Foster's Walking Laundry Line. I actually kind of have this thing for clotheslines. I just think they're one of the most beautiful things to be found in urban spaces. I like the fact that we have dryers now, but some
people still take their wet laundry outdoors, and hang it individually on a line, and led the wind dry it. I love seeing all the colourful garments dancing in the breeze, and looking at the clothing up close, speculating about which of them belongs to what member of the family, and what kind of person they are. This probably also makes me sound like a freak.
Anyway, those were just some of the pieces we looked at that I particularly liked.
Tuesday, 9 April 2013
The Handmade & The Homemade
so excited about the handmade and homemade art movement. I'm so
excited that I'm concerned about writing a coherent blog entry about
it. I feel like I've experienced a lot of it first hand already in
some ways because there's a lot of hand-making going on in Sackville,
and people seem to take a lot of pride in those aspects of time and
labour in their work, even if they might not call it art or put it in
an art context. I'm thinking of knitted garments, socks turned into
cozies for mason jars carrying tea, embroidery and felting,
zine-making and book-making, and the re-purposing of items broken or
otherwise, including the alteration, mending and even making of
clothing. I think the only thing I've made that I might classify as
handmade art is something I call my Scarf of Life. I started it in
grade 11 or 12 I think and I just worked on it whenever I felt like
it, using mostly incomplete or leftover amounts of yarn, and the rule
was that I had to keep knitting no matter what happened to mess it
up—if I dropped a stitch or there was a crazy knot I couldn't
unravel anything, I had to just keep going, which is why it was
called the scarf of life—because that's what life is like. I
experimented a lot with different knitting patterns on the scarf as
well; it was were I first tried ribbing, and using two strands of
yarn at once. I changed yarn whenever I ran out or got tired of one
colour.
There
is an intimacy and humanity with handmade art that is not always
there (or is not always meant to be there) with other kinds of art,
and for me that contributes a lot to it's beauty and my experience of
it. I adore the community aspect of it—I think that's one of the
most beautiful things about it. I mean, art can often be so
alienating, and many times it has to be because it is meant as a
challenge. Handmade art, I feel, refuses to alienate its audience by
way of challenging their isolation—challenging the sterile culture
of earphones in ears and quickly typed messages and technology coming
out of our yingyang, and everything having to be fast and easy.
Encountering handmade anything, and handmade art even moreso is like
being on a cold bus after a day of not interacting much with anyone,
and having an elderly lady sit down next to you, touch you warmly on
the shoulder and start asking about your life.
Sunday, 7 April 2013
"Field Trip" to The Owens
This
Thursday our Canadian Art class took place in the lobby of the Owens
Art Gallery where we discussed each of the pieces that hung there. I
would have to say that my absolute favourite work in the lobby that
day was Christopher Pratt's “The Suburbs Standing West”, and I
know I wasn't alone. The first time I walked into the Owen's after
the painting was hung, I was immediately drawn to it. We looked at
the work in class, projected on a screen a few months ago, but the
experience of seeing it in person, up close was a lot different, and
far more striking. I was actually so compelled by it that when my
parent drove me back after the Easter weekend I made them come in and
take a look at it (luckily the Owens was open—I didn't think it
would be). They were pretty taken with it too. The painting looks
like you could just walk through the frame and onto the winter
suburban street. When I look at it, Suburbs Standing West transports
me onto a lonely winter walk, which is beautiful an bleak at the same
time. While I feel isolated though, I also feel like I finally have
the space and time to think, and no one is watching me—I have no
social context. This is just my experience of the painting.
Although
I would have say that Suburbs Standing West is my favourite work in
the lobby, I also really enjoyed seeing Joyce Weiland's O Canada
print up close, especially after having read so much about her for my
essay. I feel like nationalism is always in the form of this
collective...mass; although nationalism wouldn't be a thing if it
wasn't felt by individuals, it always seems to take the form of a
collective attitude, and countries are so large that it becomes
impersonal. But with O Canada, we see a nationalism that isn't only
individual, but highly intimate. Weiland takes something as large and
sweeping as the Canadian national anthem and turns it into an
intimate moment of love and affection with the print of her own lips
on paper. I can't think of any time I've seen nationalism in such a
way before.
Erik Edson and Our Representations of Nature
I'm so excited, because after attending Erik Edson's artist's talk I actually have something to say in this blog that relates art to my other minor (philosophy), rather than my major (literature). First, I just want to say though that I was really impressed with his use of space in the installations that he showed us. From what I understand it's vary challenging to work in 3D (I've barely tried it, and when I have it hasn't been simple), but Erik Edson made really interesting use of space for all his installations; if I had the money, I would buy a house to live in and ask if I could pay him to "decorate" it's interior. Also, I thought it was so so cool how he used sound in his installations, especially in the piece, Burrow; it was so neat how he had the urban sounds of the parking garage coming out through the burrow, live as they were being made, and without anyone knowing they were being recorded. I feel like I use words like "neat" and "cool" way too much in these blogs, especially for an English major, but I digress, I thought his use of sound recording in Burrow was truly innovative (how's that for an adjective?).
What I mainly want to discuss here though, is Erik Edson's examination of our representations of nature. It really reminded me of an article we read in Feminist Philosophy about meat-eating and anti-vegetarianism and how it relates to sexism and racism; to be honest, it reminds me of a lot of feminist theory, actually. Edson used images of animals and nature that came from textbooks, and pre-made models of animals, and he said at the end of the talk that these are "learned representations" and that they are our "interpretations" of nature, which is totally true. A lot of feminist theory, especially as it intersects with anti-racist thought, points out the importance of recognizing that often the pervading ideas about non-dominant groups (such as animals, women, and people of colour) are just that--the interpretation of those groups by the dominant group. Society has often (and is still does) take this interpretation to be fact, or objective observation, simply because it comes from the dominant group, hence the entry of these ideas into places like textbooks, such as the ones that Edson uses in his art. Those are our--the dominant group's--interpretations of the natural world, and though we might like to think of them as objective fact, they are only our subject representations.
What I mainly want to discuss here though, is Erik Edson's examination of our representations of nature. It really reminded me of an article we read in Feminist Philosophy about meat-eating and anti-vegetarianism and how it relates to sexism and racism; to be honest, it reminds me of a lot of feminist theory, actually. Edson used images of animals and nature that came from textbooks, and pre-made models of animals, and he said at the end of the talk that these are "learned representations" and that they are our "interpretations" of nature, which is totally true. A lot of feminist theory, especially as it intersects with anti-racist thought, points out the importance of recognizing that often the pervading ideas about non-dominant groups (such as animals, women, and people of colour) are just that--the interpretation of those groups by the dominant group. Society has often (and is still does) take this interpretation to be fact, or objective observation, simply because it comes from the dominant group, hence the entry of these ideas into places like textbooks, such as the ones that Edson uses in his art. Those are our--the dominant group's--interpretations of the natural world, and though we might like to think of them as objective fact, they are only our subject representations.
Work Cited
Bailey,
Cathryn. "We Are What We Eat: Feminist Vegitarianism and the
Reproduction of Racial Identity." Hypatia 22.2
(2007): 39-59. Print.
Reactions to the Work of Jana Sterback and Valerie Blass
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)